<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Phogulum: Blog Through the Camera Eye</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phogulum.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phogulum.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cows in the River by Peeeter</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/07/14/cows-in-the-river/comment-page-1/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Peeeter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=450#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Jubedalt meeldib see võte. Tuli kohe &quot;Apocalypse Now&quot; silme ette kuidagi, kuidagi.

Muidu ka tore leht. Jo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jubedalt meeldib see võte. Tuli kohe &#8220;Apocalypse Now&#8221; silme ette kuidagi, kuidagi.</p>
<p>Muidu ka tore leht. Jo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Winter in Forest by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2010/02/13/winter-in-forest/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=1139#comment-159</guid>
		<description>I love this picture, it is outstanding!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this picture, it is outstanding!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Forest in Winter by Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2010/02/14/forest-in-winter/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 05:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=1141#comment-158</guid>
		<description>It is very beautiful indeed, and the camera that was used is very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is very beautiful indeed, and the camera that was used is very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Tartu by Tartu in Winter &#171; Phogulum: Blog Through the Camera Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2008/05/19/tartu/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>Tartu in Winter &#171; Phogulum: Blog Through the Camera Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 11:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=26#comment-146</guid>
		<description>[...] Try to find ten differences between this picture and the photo in here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Try to find ten differences between this picture and the photo in here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner is Better Than a Lab by Phogulum</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/11/24/why-epson-perfection-v700-photo-scanner-is-better-than-a-lab/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Phogulum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 21:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=803#comment-143</guid>
		<description>I just scanned my parents&#039; slide collection with nearly 2000 photos in it and I know how much work it is. That&#039;s why I think you should choose Epson V700. With it you can scan 12 slides at the time while V600 holder holds only 4 slides. For collections of 1000+ I think this is big difference if you have to load scanner 84 or 250 times. Epson&#039;s software &quot;Epson Scan&quot; has two easy modes - &quot;full automatic&quot; and &quot;home&quot;. Both are very easy to use and provides two options for color restoration. Anyway I suggest to download a newer version of this software from Epson&#039;s homepage under support section. Talking about speed, I used resolution 2400 dpi that is enough for A4 prints and scanning twelve slides took less than 10 minutes. That is the time between reloads which can be used for reading a book, surfing the Internet or making a coffee :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just scanned my parents&#8217; slide collection with nearly 2000 photos in it and I know how much work it is. That&#8217;s why I think you should choose Epson V700. With it you can scan 12 slides at the time while V600 holder holds only 4 slides. For collections of 1000+ I think this is big difference if you have to load scanner 84 or 250 times. Epson&#8217;s software &#8220;Epson Scan&#8221; has two easy modes &#8211; &#8220;full automatic&#8221; and &#8220;home&#8221;. Both are very easy to use and provides two options for color restoration. Anyway I suggest to download a newer version of this software from Epson&#8217;s homepage under support section. Talking about speed, I used resolution 2400 dpi that is enough for A4 prints and scanning twelve slides took less than 10 minutes. That is the time between reloads which can be used for reading a book, surfing the Internet or making a coffee <img src='http://www.phogulum.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner is Better Than a Lab by Vic</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/11/24/why-epson-perfection-v700-photo-scanner-is-better-than-a-lab/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=803#comment-142</guid>
		<description>I am buying my parents a slide scanner for my dad&#039;s 75th birthday. They have the classic 1000+ slide archives that we want to digitize. We need a balance between speed, quality and ease of use...with an emphasis on ease of use. My parents will only use automated settings with minimal to no post processing (they are EXTREMELY basic tech users). I have the money to get them the v700, but worry that it may over complicate things. I&#039;m pretty sure the quality difference between the two is pretty minimal for their eyes, but what is the speed and out of the box experience difference between the two? Is the v600 easier to use? Especially if they aren&#039;t post processing much at all (no Photoshop). 

Thanks, V</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am buying my parents a slide scanner for my dad&#8217;s 75th birthday. They have the classic 1000+ slide archives that we want to digitize. We need a balance between speed, quality and ease of use&#8230;with an emphasis on ease of use. My parents will only use automated settings with minimal to no post processing (they are EXTREMELY basic tech users). I have the money to get them the v700, but worry that it may over complicate things. I&#8217;m pretty sure the quality difference between the two is pretty minimal for their eyes, but what is the speed and out of the box experience difference between the two? Is the v600 easier to use? Especially if they aren&#8217;t post processing much at all (no Photoshop). </p>
<p>Thanks, V</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner is Better Than a Lab by Epson V700 Scanner</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/11/24/why-epson-perfection-v700-photo-scanner-is-better-than-a-lab/comment-page-1/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Epson V700 Scanner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 18:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=803#comment-135</guid>
		<description>Undoubtedly, Epson V700 is one of the bests canner. I recently got a chance to review few scanners and Epson V700 and Canon 8800F were the best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undoubtedly, Epson V700 is one of the bests canner. I recently got a chance to review few scanners and Epson V700 and Canon 8800F were the best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner is Better Than a Lab by Phogulum</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/11/24/why-epson-perfection-v700-photo-scanner-is-better-than-a-lab/comment-page-1/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Phogulum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=803#comment-133</guid>
		<description>There are no film holders for 110 film with Epson V700 in standard but seems that the holder is available for example in the ebay. If you&#039;re choosing between &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002OEBMRU?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=wakb-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B002OEBMRU&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Epson V600&lt;/a&gt; and Epson V700, it will come to what you&#039;re planning to do with it. Epson V600 doesn&#039;t have as good image quality as V700 but still much better than cheap flatbed scanners. Also V600 lets you scan only two 35 mm, one 120 film strips or four slides at the time. If that&#039;s enough and you don&#039;t need high end scanning quality, then Epson V600 should probably do the trick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are no film holders for 110 film with Epson V700 in standard but seems that the holder is available for example in the ebay. If you&#8217;re choosing between <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B002OEBMRU?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=wakb-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=B002OEBMRU" rel="nofollow">Epson V600</a> and Epson V700, it will come to what you&#8217;re planning to do with it. Epson V600 doesn&#8217;t have as good image quality as V700 but still much better than cheap flatbed scanners. Also V600 lets you scan only two 35 mm, one 120 film strips or four slides at the time. If that&#8217;s enough and you don&#8217;t need high end scanning quality, then Epson V600 should probably do the trick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Epson Perfection V700 Photo Scanner is Better Than a Lab by sheryl</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/11/24/why-epson-perfection-v700-photo-scanner-is-better-than-a-lab/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>sheryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=803#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Will the negative holder holder 110 size film strips from 70&#039;s? Would the Epson V600 work as well? In market for scanner that holds 110 strips and 7mm film would also be big great feature for under 300$. Thanks for your opinion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the negative holder holder 110 size film strips from 70&#8217;s? Would the Epson V600 work as well? In market for scanner that holds 110 strips and 7mm film would also be big great feature for under 300$. Thanks for your opinion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Arrival of Firewood by Kadri</title>
		<link>http://www.phogulum.com/2009/10/08/arrival-of-firewood/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Kadri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 08:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phogulum.com/?p=644#comment-129</guid>
		<description>see üks tüüp seal paremapoolsel kaadril on küll väga kummituslik...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see üks tüüp seal paremapoolsel kaadril on küll väga kummituslik&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
